手机浏览器扫描二维码访问
(例:UC浏览器、QQ浏览器)
精彩阅读小薇中文网

第58章

[1]anewcriticaleditionwithanitaliantranslationanddetailedntaryisgivenbyaperti,giiodipisidiapoei1panegiriciepici,ettal1960

[2]edlsternbach,analectaavarica,craw1900cfalvizantiskiizvori1,159ff

[3]edcdeboor,2vols,leipzig,1883-5thencdgsection(717-813)hasbeentranslatedtoran,withantroductionbylbreyer,bilderstreitundaraberstur,byzantischeschichtsschreiber6graz1957

[4]cfostrogorsky,&lso;chronologie&rso;1ff,wheretheolderworkontheprobleofthechronologyoftheophanesisdiscsed;alyarticle,&lso;theophanes&rso;,(reihe2)10(1934),2127ff5grul,eo33(1934),319ff,atteptstoexpnthensistencybeeentheworldyearsandthedictionsbysugstgthattheophanesreckonedhisyearfro25archandnotfro1septeber,butthisisnotverysatisfactoryasdolrshows(bz35(1935),154f)cfalfdolr,&lso;daskaiserjahrderbyzanter&rso;,sbderbayerakaddwissensch,1949,heft1,p21,38;danastasijevic,&lso;carskijgodvvizanti&rso;(theiperialyearbyzantiu),sekond11(1940),147ffandesp170ff,abandonsgrul&rso;stheoryandaeptsyncsions,althoughhensidersthatthediscrepancybeeenthedictionandworldyearswhichfirstappearstheophanes&rso;chroniclefortheyear609-10didnotntueupto714-15,butrighteditselfthelastyearsofnstans2thearchreckongtheoryhasbeenrecentlydefendedby5os,&lso;artovskodatiranje&rso;,istorglasnik1-2(1951),19-57butcfyreviewbz46(1953),170ff,whereitisshownthatthearchreckongwasnotwidespreadasosandgrulwouldliketoiply,andthatitcannotexpnthechronologicalpeculiaritiesoftheophanes&rso;chronicle,which,onthentrary,followsthesepteberreckong

[5]edcdeboor,leipzig1880thelondonsbritisheuadd19390(nthcentury)wasnotedbydeboor,buthasrecentlybeenadeknownbylorosz,thelondonancriptofnikephoros&lso;breviariu&rso;,budapest1948,whogivesthetextofthefirstpart(top15,2,eddeboor),andforthesendpart,wherethedifferenceisuchless,hellateswithdeboor&rso;stextandgivesthevariantreadgsforafullaountoftheliteraryworkandpernalityofnicephor,seealexander,partnicephor

[6]frenchtransbyfacler,histoired&rso;héracliparl&rso;évêesebéos,traduitedel&rso;arnienetannotée,paris1904rsiantransbykpatkanov,istorijaipirakla,perevodsarjanskogo(historyoftheeperorheracli,atranslationfrothearnian),stpetersburg1862ontheuchdiscsedestionofthestructure,theurcesandthedateoftheworkseessal插sjanc,&lso;istoriksebeos&rso;,5527(1949),94ff

[7]edwithfrenchtransbyhzotenberg,chroniedejeanevêedenikiou,noticesetextraitsdesssdelabiblnationale10104(1883);englishtransbyrh插rles,thechronicleofjohn,bishopofnikiu,translfrozotenberg&rso;sethiopictext,london1916

[8]edwithlattranstherpscriptchristorient,scriptoressyri,ser3,vol4,1-3(1903-5)。

[9]ibvol7(1910)。

[10]edwithfrenchtransbyjb插bot,lachroniedeichellesyrien,3vols,paris1899-1904

[11]aass,oct8,vol4,104ff,162ff(=igne,pg116,1204ff,1325ff);atougard,del&rso;histoireprofanedanslesactesgrecsdesbollandistes,paris1874

[12]cffbarisic,cudadiitrijanskogkaoistoriskiizvor(theiraclesofstdetriofthessalonicaasanhistoricalurce),belgrade1954;plerle,&lso;lapositionetlachronologiedesdeuxpreierslivresdesiraculasdetrii&rso;,bz46(1953),349-61aburov,&lso;slavjanskitenapadenijasrescunv&ldo;cudesatanasvdiitra&rdo;itjachnatachronologija(thesiesofthessalonicabytheslavsthe&rso;iraclesofstdetri&rso;andtheirchronology)&rso;,godisniknafilos-istorfak2,fia1952,167-214

[13]ansiⅪ,196ffand929ff

[14]igne,pg90and91

[15]thebestedisbywashburner,&lso;thefarr&rso;slaw&rso;,jhs30(1910),85-108;32(1912),68-95,withapparatcritic,detailednotesandenglishtransthetextisreprtedzepos,j2,65-71

[16]asthetitleshows,thefarr&rso;slawnsistsofextractsfroalaw-bookofjtian,andtheproblehasarisenastowhethertheyefrothelegalworksofjtiani(despitethefactthattheyactuallydealwithwhatispredoantlynewlaw,whiletheparallelswhichcanbefoundjtiani&rso;slawappeartobeparativelysignificant:cfwashburner,opcit,32,p90ff,andfdolr,&lso;noosikos&rso;35ff),orwhethertheyareextractsfroanunknownlaw-bookofjtian2theolderresearchaftercujaci&rso;tisupportedthislatterview,butitwaslostsightofwhenotherviewswere插pionedortreuil,histoiredudroitbyzant1(1843),395,andcweheibach,&lso;schdesgriech-roischenrechts&rso;erschundgruber,enzyklopdwiss86(1868),278f,thoughtthatthetitleofthefarr&rso;slawreferredtothelegalworkofjtian1ofstillgreaterfenceweretheviewsofza插riaschichte250ff;hewasledbythecloserelationshipofthefarr&rso;slawtotheeclogaoleo3andnstante5toattributeittotheseeperors,butthenhewasparticularlypartialtotheinoclastrulers(his&lso;favourites&rso;,asashburnersays,opcit,vol32,p73)andgivesthecreditforanuberofotherworksforwhichwenowknowthattheyuldnothavebeenresponsibleasanyotherprobles,za插ria&rso;sauthoritativewordsecuredtheaeptanceofhisviewforti,spiteofthereanedcriticissofsuchscholarsaspancenko,&lso;krestjanskajabstvennost&rso;(peasantproprietorship),24ff,andashburner,opcit,32,p87ffthediscsiontookanewturnwhengvernadsky,&lso;surl&rso;origedelaloiagraire&rso;,b2(1925),127ff,orerecentlyputthecaseforattributgtheworktojtian2hissugstionsweresupportedbyste,&lso;voaltertu&rso;162andbz31(1931),355,vasiliev,histoire1(1932),325(cfhistory(1952),245),bréhier,stitutions176,ostrogorsky,bz30(1929-30),396,andb6(1931),240;cfalhgrégoire,b12(1937),642theywerenotaeptedbyfdolr,hz141(1930),112f,and&lso;noosikos&rso;21ff,orbyelipsic,&lso;vizantijskoekrestjanstvoislavjanskajakolonizacija&rso;(thebyzantepeasantryandslavlonization),vizsbornik(1945),100ffoftheancriptsofthefarr&rso;slawfarknown,onlyone(parisgr1367,elfthcentury)givesaclearreferencetothelegalworksofjtian1,andherethetitleiswhatpeculiarandthepyistcitesthedistandstitutesaswellasanuberofunidentifiedwritgsbutthescriptionstheotherancripts,withuniportantvariations,read:,(onthestraditionseeashburner,opcit,30,p85ff,andjdealafosse,&lso;lesloisagrairesàl&rso;époebyzante&rso;,recueildel&rso;acaddelégislation19,1949,11ff)theeofthesgularforissignificant,foritprecdesanyreferencetojtianiwhichwouldhavebeenfollowedbythepralofthesixsscitedbyashburner(additiontotheparisgr1367),onlytheelfth-centuryarcgr167givesthepralfor,whiletheotherfive(cdgthethreeoldest,andprobablydependent,piesoftheeleventhcentury)agreereadg(or)thisfact(asistatedyfirsteditionofthisbookandy&lso;agrariannditions&rso;198)seestotobeavitalpotsettlgthisuchdisputedestionneverthelessdolr,&lso;noosikos&rso;30f,doesnotregnizeitsforce,althoughhecannotrefuteitituldonlybevalidatedifwehadabyzantelegalworkwhichshowedfroitstitlethatitwasobviolyreferrgtojtiani&rso;srpandcitedthisasτo&rso;buttheecloga,whichisallprobabilityanearnteporaryofthefarr&rso;slaw,showstheualwayofakgsuchreferencecasesofcitationfrojtiani&rso;srp;itwasfactaselectionfrohislegalworksandthescriptionclearlydescribesitasanoppositiontoza插ria&rso;sview(schichte250ff)thatthefarr&rso;slawwasanofficialwork,dolr,&lso;noosikos&rso;,atteptstoshowthatitwasaprivatepilationbutwhetherthefarr&rso;slawwhichhasedowntowasorigofficialorunofficial,the&lso;bookofjtian&rso;frowhichtheseextractsregulatgeverydaypeasantlifearetakenwascertalyanofficialpilation,andevidenceallpotstowardsalegalworkofjtian2theestionofthedateofthefarr&rso;slawis,however,oreiportantthantheestionofauthorship,anddolr(&lso;noosikos&rso;48)fallyncdesthatitostprobablybelongstotheendoftheseventhcenturyorthefirstarteroftheeighthcenturycfdolr,&lso;harnopulosunddernoosikos&rso;,(1951)seeallerle,&lso;histoireagraire&rso;,219(i),p53ffthearticlebyjkarayannopulos,&lso;entstehungundbedeutungdesnoosikos&rso;,bz51(1958),357ff,whichatteptstoshowthatthefarr&rso;slaw&lso;keeneuerunnaweist&rso;but&lso;nuralteresrechtwiedergibt&rso;isapletefaire

相邻小说
马力的悬疑事件簿--无形敌  古玩宗师在现代  夏迟意长  名福妻实  禁止恐A  [网王]邂逅  [快穿]主角总想皮一把  重生之舐血魔妃  我的信息素成精了  穿进古代末世,靠着家底搞基建  公主天天撩暗卫  我很高贵前夫不配  月亮对我笑  海伯利安四部曲3:安迪密恩  作精剑灵最好命  (影视同人)琉璃月(狄王同人)  (盗墓笔记同人)盗墓笔记之女主在此  荔枝甜酒  我在坟场画皮十五年  [新神榜 x HP]难明